Victoria Fantozzi, Ph.D.
School of Education, Purchase, NY
Social Links
Biography
Dr. Victoria Fantozzi is an associate professor of childhood and early childhood education. Prior to joining the faculty at Manhattanville University, she was an assistant professor at William Paterson University in the Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Education and an elementary school teacher. She teaches courses in Emergent Literacies, Early Childhood Foundations, and Research Methods. Her research agenda includes teacher education, curriculum history and developmentally appropriate technology use in early childhood classrooms. Dr. Fantozzi has presented her research at national conferences including the annual meetings of the International Reading Association and the Association of Teacher Educators. She has published in international journals such as Educational Researcher, Young Children, and the Reading Teacher.
Areas of Expertise
Teaching Remotely
Enrichment Programs
Curriculum Design
Early Childhood Education
Social Studies
Childhood Literacy
Teaching & Learning Technologies
Education
2010
Ph.D., Curriculum and Instruction
2003
M.T., Elementary Education
2003
B.A., Psychology
Affiliations
- New York State Association of Early Childhood Teacher Educators : Treasurer
- National Association for the Education of Young Children : Member
- National Council of Teachers of English : Member
- National Council of Teachers of English : Member
- New York State Association of Early Childhood Teacher Educators : Member
- Association of Teacher Educators : Member
Selected Media Appearances
Lohud
2020-03-19
Now, the time for preparation is over. Teachers are having their routines upended, and will have to adjust on the fly, said Victoria Fantozzi, an associate professor of childhood and early childhood education at Manhattanville University in Purchase. “Online courses have planned routines and structures because you know you won’t see students face-to-face,” she said. “Here, teachers are being thrown into this. They have to take what they do daily in their classrooms, and make it work online.” Fantozzi said that teachers who have used online learning platforms extensively will at least know how to plan for teaching online.
The Journal News
2020-03-19
Now, the time for preparation is over. Teachers are having their routines upended, and will have to adjust on the fly, said Victoria Fantozzi, an associate professor of childhood and early childhood education at Manhattanville University in Purchase. “Online courses have planned routines and structures because you know you won’t see students face-to-face,” she said. “Here, teachers are being thrown into this. They have to take what they do daily in their classrooms, and make it work online.” Fantozzi said that teachers who have used online learning platforms extensively will at least know how to plan for teaching online. “Those teachers are used to thinking about the kinds of work they can do with their students,” she said. “Other teachers will need training and time.”
Baristanet
2016-02-08
Fantozzi says of the program, “It has enabled the children to use language to describe their work in an easy and seamless way. They are avid storytellers and love describing their art, projects and thoughts. We have coupled their natural excitement and energy and taught them to use the iPad for photos and video they can narrate. Our goal is for them to see the iPad as a tool for them to be able to express their stories.”
Selected Event Appearances
International Reading Association
New Orleans, LA., May 2014
National Council of Teachers of English Assembly for Research
Elmhurst, IL., January 2014
Association of Teacher Educators Annual Conference
February 2013
Association of Teacher Educators Annual Conference
LaSalle University, February 2013
Association of Teacher Educators Annual Conference
University of Mary Washington, February 2013
Selected Articles
Article
2018
In this article, the researchers share results from an action research project focused on supporting teacher education students' knowledge of children's literature and identities as readers. The researchers present analysis of teacher education students' blog posts about children's and young adult literature, class discussion, and survey data. Analysis reveals that the teacher education students not only gained knowledge about a wide range of texts but that their own reading identities seemed to change through the processes of text selection and text review using an online, participatory, and open platform for sharing.
The Reading Teacher
2017
Every day, we are surrounded by stories in print, on social media, in blogs, on the radio, and in stories from our friends and family. The ways people make meaning and communicate are increasingly multimodal and digital; yet, the preschool classroom, for all its multimodal learning, is sometimes devoid of technology. In this action research project, the authors integrated an iPad into a play-based preschool classroom to support emergent literacy and playful storytelling. The students used multimodal and multi-actor storytelling to collaborate, navigate their places in the classroom, and connect their school experiences to their home lives.
Article
2017
Background/Context: Over the last century, perhaps no school in American history has been studied more than John Dewey's Laboratory School at the University of Chicago (1896-1904). Scholars have published dozens of articles, books, essays, and assessments of a school that existed for only seven and a half years. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: This article reviews the extensive firsthand accounts and historiography of the famed school. In the first section, the authors trace the published accounts of those who experienced the Dewey School firsthand between 1895 and 1904. In the second section, the authors review accounts of the school by contemporaries, reformers, and historians between 1904 and 2014, focusing on three historiographical areas: the events surrounding the closing of the school, the rationale underlying its curriculum, and the impact of the experiment on U.S. schools. In the third section, the authors argue that most accounts of the Dewey School convey one of three historiographical myths: the Dewey School as misunderstood; the Dewey School as triumph, and/or the Dewey School as tragedy. Research Design: A historiographical essay is a narrative and analytical account of what has been written on a particular historical topic. Following this methodology, the authors are less concerned with establishing what happened at the Dewey School, than they were with how the school was analyzed and interpreted by contemporaries and historians over the past 120 years. Conclusions/Recommendations: The authors analyze each myth to conclude that Dewey only subscribed to the myth of the Dewey School as misunderstood, while the other two were historiographical constructions created by Dewey's contemporaries and historians.
Mentoring and Tutoring
2016
Research has shown that mentor teachers play varied roles. Using a conceptual framework grounded in these roles, the researchers explored what seven student teachers said during multiple interviews about the roles they wanted for their mentor teachers. Findings showed that while some participants preferred emotional support and others wanted instructional support, none wanted socialization. The researchers identified a new category–mentor as gatekeeper–to capture the preferences of one participant and concerns of others. This category reflected a focus on the credentialing aspect of student teaching as something that students must complete before licensure. Implications for teacher education included additional support for mentor teacher–preservice teacher pairs such as conversations about desired, expected, possible, and emerging roles during the mentoring process.
Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Education Studies Association
2015
A century ago, John Dewey and his daughter Evelyn published Schools of To-morrow to nearly universal acclaim. However, over the course of the 20th century, critics of Dewey have drawn upon Schools of To-morrow to accuse him of being an uncritical disciple of French philosopher, Jean Rousseau, of being opposed to the transmission of content to students, and most recently of endorsing a curriculum that patronized Black students. As a result, the text has become John Dewey's most controversial and problematic. In this historical study, we seek to place Schools of To-morrow in its historical, intellectual, and social context. The first part of the study traces the writing and publication of the text, as well as its changing reception over the past century. The second part of the study directly responds to the three criticisms previously cited: that Dewey was a disciple of Rousseau, that Dewey was opposed to the transmission of content knowledge, and that Dewey endorsed the racially segregated school system of Indianapolis depicted in the text. Drawing upon Dewey's other writings, his course syllabi, his personal correspondence, and lecture notes, we argue that the first two accusations are unfounded, but the third is partially accurate, although incomplete. We conclude that Schools of To-morrow is an undervalued text in the Dewey cannon that warrants closer study.